Molon Labe
Montani Semper Liberi
Para Fides Paternae Patria

Saturday, June 16, 2018

Entitled feeling AA woman thinks rules don't apply to her color of skin.
Unanswered is the question, does the hotel have a rule about having to shower before getting in the pool?  Did the man observe they did not follow it?

The BS about the Starbuck's bathroom is just that.  They can't have people taking up space in the place and not ordering anything.  Starbucks had a rule that you had to be a patron to use the bathroom, Starbucks a had right to enforce that rule. Starbuck's "victims" settle for 1$.
Yes, Trump! is putting on a good show, a sitzkreig.

No, he is not doing even as much to secure the borders as even Obama did.

Use the Walmart test.  Got to a local Walmart and look around.  Are their fewer plausible illegal immigrants there or not?  There's no lack of them in my part of VA.
Is this really a surplus?

It's not unless the fraction of monies talked about come back within the US' borders as becomes liquidity within our domestic economy.
Ties between researchers and alcohol producers prompt NIH to shut down study of moderate drinking
 Translation:  Only people already in the tank for neo-Prohibitionism will be allowed to study alcohol health effects.

Suggestion, all .gov funds used to fund "studies" should be held in escrow for five years -- if "researchers" are wise.  Because if another researcher can poke holes in the first study, then they should get a healthy cut of the first grant.

Making studies which are too easily debunked should be negligence, and sufficiently too easily debunked should be prima facie evidence of fraud.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Such thin skinned yellow journalists's they're turning out these days.

So Doug Messier has banned me from Parabolicarc.

That's no surprise, he's a hack with an agenda and a fairly conventional leftist at that.

 Here's how I found out, I went to post this comment on his blog.

" It does not have an accusatory tone in any way. "

Maybe not, in fact, written in bureaucratese, it almost certainly is not overt.

The question is whether it has language in it to justify Mr. Messiers accusatory, sensationalist "journalism", and it does not.

 And when I went to post it, I was banned.

Doug, you have an obsession with gotchaism unless it's government talking--then for you it's gospel.  You confidently state howlers like claiming multiple parallel system isn't redundancy (when that is exactly that throughout the aerospace industry) and I'm feeling on safe ground predicting you've had at least one wet dream about getting a Pulitzer.

I'll happily read your blog for info, but if you closed up shop tomorrow, I couldn't care.  All in all you're just another lefty hack.

It's so vicious because the stakes are so small.

Saturday, June 11, 2016

The Anti-SpaceX crankery of "James"

The Anti-SpaceX crankery of "James"

So I'll elaborate on how uninformed and unintelligent "James"* comments are before the day is out by updating this post, but in short--

No, Elon Musk and SpaceX have nothing at all to do with proliferating ICBM technology.  The concept has been in existence for over 75 years, and the laws of physics are the same for everyone.  China, India, Pakistan, Israel, even little North Korea have all produced their own ICBM (or IRBMs or TBMs) because this just isn't that hard or costly to do...and they had no assistance whatsoever from Elon Musk.

What SpaceX has done is show how relatively easy and inexpensive it can be to orbit a pound right now, and how inexpensive it can be in the near future, and it is every bit as cheap as space exploration enthusiasts have long said it was.  All we get from SpaceX is the reality of less expensive spaceflight, with no additional risk.  Every "bad actor" who wants an ICBM, IRBM, or TBM will get it whether or not SpaceX flourishes or fails.

ULA and government bootlickers like James / Gary Church be damned.

This posts is prompted by the anti-SpaceX crankery of James seen here:

Anti SpaceX nuts > Enjoy the Crankery

So I've attracted the troll Gary Michael Church, supposedly as his victim. 

He made these posts pretending to be me.*
"While I admire Musk, that doesn't mean I uncritically get down on my knees and suck his cock like you Musk Worshippers do."
"You are the troll Gary. How can you ... is any justice."

*Or someone wanting to bury Gary's reputation even further sockpuppeted me as if they were Gary.  Gary has already admitted using sock puppets under his own name, so he has no credibility to destroy on that point--such effort is superfluous.

This is in fact a comment by me:

Sunday, March 08, 2015

The unbearable lightness of Sarah Hoyt...


and first here

Sarah Hoyt argues that not merely is the tea Party aligned group of people making enough progress that it should keep on doing what they are doing, but that it is a false flag effort which has put the piquancy in to the current talk of a 3rd party effort.

Well, as I must, I fisk below.

"that haven’t I seen that Boehner is the worst thing evah, evah, and the only choice is to start shooting."

It's a strawman she's defending against to pick out the least and worst of the arguments against her viewpoint without dealing with the best of them.

“What are you going to gain by this?”

Actual change for the better instead of what the GOP has produces over the last 100 years.

"It let up a little after November (had to, right?)"

Not if it was really a flase flag operation, which it isn't.

"Look, I’m the ... the executive orders?”

You don’t love it enough to push them into taking the steps required to do it, do you?  What do you love more?  Evidently, matters as they are.

“And yep, the press will paint us as just impeaching democrats not because they’re bottomless pits of corruption, but because we disagree with them.”

If you concede the nation to LIVs, then there is no point to any effort at all, is there?

“Our side is afraid of the nuclear option. Yes, it’s stupid. But our side is."

And if stupid can't be fixed, it seems you don't want a different side?  If it can be fixed, you don't want the steps required to accomplish it to be taken.

"And if you don’t fund the DHS now, you get to be blamed by Obama when his several setups for an attack pay off.”

That’ll happen unless we give him whatever he wants, and I certainly won’t support giving him whatever he wants, why do you, Sarah?  If you will, how is the false flag not yours?

“If you don’t do that, consider there’s a good chance you’re being played by the usual way the media reports such things.”

It’s not the MSM doing that reporting Sarah.  Why do you want us to disbelieve the rightmost?  Are you carrying a false flag Sarah?

“What is more important, HOW is your magical party going to avoid the fate of the Tea Party which got demonized with LIVs in… two years? Tops?"

Why do you pretend the LIV's are even in play?  Who cares if we are demonized in the eyes of people who will never vote for anyone but Democrats anyway?

"Yeah, the Republican brand sucks. So will any other that is not democrat.”

Hah!  Patrick H. had the reply for that a long time ago.  If this be suckage. make the most of it!
Not, Sarah, the least of it.


The GOP Establishment won't.  They'll vanish.  The GOP, Sarah, is us.  We won't vanish.

"What you’re saying is “I’m going to keep the dems in power for the rest of our natural lives.”"

Not at all.  The nation won't last the rest of my or your natural life at this rate, and it is no rate the GOP is currently constituted shows any signs of modifying in the slightest.  It has been utterly ineffective over the course of the last 100 years, why do you think that will change in 10 years, if we don't shatter the premises of the party as it exists?  How do you think we best shatter those premises, if not by mounting the most credible 3rd party threat we can?  I don't shape steel by letting it rest on the anvil even at white heat--I hit it with a sledge.

"You know what ... the loyal opposition."

Then let them honestly seek their most natural home, you dolt.

"Have you considered ... out of line?”

A perfectly credible part of a 3rd party effort.

“As for “let  ... a brutal dictatorship.”

Learn from American history, Sarah, not Europe’s.  It’s on fire now, and you bid us to quietly support those who want to add cups but not gallons of gasoline to the fire, where the only reasonable and sane option is to support those who want to get an extinguisher.

“Guys, I lived ... to do something.”

Who cares if that's what the Democrat centers scream for, if it comes to it?  Let them scream.
They'll scream anyway, it's where the 120 to 220 trillion in unfunded liabilities are geographically concentrated.  It's on fire now, the question is what are you prepared to do to stop stacking up fuel?  Evidently, not shove the Establishment GOP hard enough to get it done.

"Humanity is disastrously prone to the man on the white horse syndrome. Pray we don’t get one here."

Been there, done that, got George Washington.  I'm prepared to let our future history rhyme with 1775, and if it won't, what's the point in putting off the inevitable?

"All modern insurrection movements end up doing things like bombing school buses. "

That might be the way YOU'D do it.

"But if we go that way, the chances are that 90% of the outcomes are that it will burn.”

WILL?  It’s on fire now dear.

“I’m saying we need something like the tea parties (we can even call it the same and tell the mass media to stow it.)”

Oh!  What a brave heart you!

“So they can start behaving, or we’ll pull them down.”

No better way to do that than to create the most credible 3rd party threat we can. No.  Way.  Better.

“not accidentally lend weight to the other side by making our squishes think the left is their only hope."

If they are that close to doing it, we are better of without them.

"And we need to work. At media, at education, at entertainment. The tide is turning, and pushing the boat in now will work."

The GOP Establishment is actually Canute, commanding it to be still.  Unlike Canute, they can actually do something like say, preserving an anti-amnesty bill from an Obama veto because they actually wasn't the amnesty.  You know, the straw that broke the camel's back with respect to a lot of what you are baselessly or dishonestly calling a false flag effort.

"Is it less satisfying than the other options. Oh, for sure. I too sometimes just want the grand, simple solution."

Actually, what is wanted is something which can work, unlike voting GOP Establishment, which hasn't worked for 100 or more years.

“ Life is more usually a choice between shit and slightly more shit.”

And you are picking the more option.

“It took them 100 years to get here. 100. “

100 years when the Establishment GOP has been either utterly ineffective or even on the Democrat's side.  The one part of the leftist’s agenda which has been partly reversed with some appearance of permanence is the 86 AWB, which was allowed to sunset by the Establishment GOP Bush.  It was actually allowed to go into place by Reagan, who admittedly had other fish to fry.  That’s one piece of the leftist agenda, every other piece has been steadily advanced for 100 years.
100 years.
Time to try something else, Sarah.

“We’ve been fighting for 6."

Nope, we've been here for the whole 100 years Sarah.  History didn't start in 2008.  I know you've decided to be pigheadedly stupid about this, but even you surely will shrink from attempting to substitute your wishes for reality.

"Why is third party or letting it burn such an almighty hurry?"

Because the next crash is likely to be the last where the dollar is what crashes.  120 trillion to 220 trillion in unfunded liabilities.  Grow Up Sarah.  Let's let the GOP Establishment play roulette with the market, Putin, and Beijing holding the trigger.  We're under no obligation to stay in front of that muzzle.  We can represent an actual alternative instead.

"If it comes to fighting, I’ll fight.”

No you won’t, you won’t fight now, why would you later?

“Ask yourself “What do you expect to accomplish with this?””

The most pressure possible to force the GOP Establishment from power, without which there is no effective opposition to the Democrats, as the last 100 years show very well.

“I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible that you may be mistaken.”

You seem not to consider the same with respect to your position, although the last 100 years reproach you.
With respect to the GOP Establishment, I also quote Cromwell:

“You have sat too long for any good you have been doing lately ... Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"

And the most credible 3rd party effort which can be mounted is the best way to accomplish it.
The trigger need not be pulled every time for it to be effective, but it must be built into a credible gun.
The Tea Party should mount primaries in which it chooses a single candidate to try to depose not merely the least conservative of GOP Establishment candidates in otherwise safe districts, it should sponsor long-shots in the bluest of Dem territory and should under the Tea Party name, announcing ahead of time the intention to caucus with Republicans if elected, split the nominal GOP vote in what should be safe GOP territory, and make the Establishment chose between conceding the seat to the Dems...
...or resigning the fight to the Tea Party candidate.

We can spare a few seats, pour encourage les autres.

The GOP Establishment has been spoiling attempts to return the nation to even vaguely constitutional governance for 100 years. Be willing to make them own it, or as useless as they've been, make them in the name of God go, is not spoiling any election that isn't already spoilt.

Saturday, October 05, 2013

Buzz Aldrin doesn't know space travel, not in 2013.

No, Buzz Aldrin doesn't know better.

Not even about space travel.

He feels we are in danger of "losing something".  My reply to a commenter below.

No, I'm certain he doesn't know better.

And it isn't that I said private enterprise is always better--nice strawman you're trying to build there--but that in this case it self-evidently is.

We are in danger of losing nothing of value, as long as the government stays out of SpaceX's way. Aldrin's preferred way of doing business (which is all we are in danger of losing) is a Shuttle Launch System that achieves 4% of program goals and murders 14 people.

And yes I mean murder. The government management inherent to Aldrin's approach leads to not merely potential but certain causes of catastrophic failure to be ignored, a criminal level of negligence rising to the category of murder. That sort of government entanglement with launch vehicle design and operation leads directly to an attitude that the volunteer astronauts should be grateful we allow them to risk their life with what is only taxpayer dollars anyway. The sheer contempt for life shown by NASA's ignoring Thiokol engineers RE Challenger and not even assessing the damage RE Columbia is breathtaking, and is consistent with the institutional mismanagement of risk seen in the Apollo 1 fire. Forty years of doing wonderful things at an abjectly unnecessarily high cost in blood and treasure.

Will SpaceX and it's future competitors lose vehicles and people? Will some be mismanaged?

Of course.

Then let the chips fall where they may, but not be propped up as gold-plated zombie programs always getting gov dollars and never seeing metal cut, let alone lofting payload at a reasonable cost.
May ULA/LockMart be let to rust, the iron oxide is more valuable than is their approach to space travel or structure.

The only appropriate role our national government necessarily has in space, is using the military as required to assure freedom of navigation, and that private property rights are kept from foreign interference.

If NASA is to develop new tech, that's fine as long as they charge a reasonable license fee. If NASA is to do research, that's fine, but better the payload is lofted at $50 or $500 a pound on a Falcon, not NASA's launch model of $8,000/# minimum.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

CBS Anchor: 'We Are Getting Big Stories Wrong, Over and Over Again'

"Democracies succeed or fail based on their journalism," said Pelley. "America is strong because its journalism is strong."

What planet is he on?!  America's journalism  has been in the tank for the mistake of Rousseau for the entirety of my lifetime.  And since the 1920's an no later.

It's been at least 100 years since America was strong other than in spite of it's journalists.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

A General Officer with balls.

Found a new quote today. (new to me)


There is disagreement amongst sources as to what was said, but the gist of it is fantastic.

This man was Norman Cota, Major General U.S. Army.  He was 51 when at Omaha beach at D-Day, he was the ranking officer ashore.  He observed his lane of advance was blocked by a machine gun nest, and he ordered a man to try to run past it, the man was shot badly without making any progress.

So he observed his men being slaughtered on the beach, and shouted out, "We're all being killed here, let's go inland and get killed."  Meaning let's at least die making progress against the enemy.

Then he did what I suspect some generals would not.  He picked up a grease gun and he charged the nest.  He made it.  Enough followed him that they got a grenade in the German position, and then all those behind them...

...moved on towards Berlin.